_25_11_2024_15_40_33.jpg)
_25_11_2024_15_40_55.jpg)
_25_11_2024_15_43_24.jpg)
|
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Should PM's be Mod Readable? |
|
| Sun, 17 Sep 2006, 07:51 | |
Jayenkai
|
(Need Polls.. Can't be arsed making Poll code..) PM, the idea is in the name. PRIVATE messaging. But if people are able to hide things from mods, is that a good idea? People could use the PM system as a way to discuss Site Hacks, and other such things. Given the Private nature of PM's, though, I'd prefer not to have to allow Mod access to them. But I feel I have a duty to allow access, just in case. I'm not sure. What are your opinions on the subject? -=-=- ''Load, Next List!'' 
|
| Sun, 17 Sep 2006, 07:56 | |
Scherererer
|
Well, nothing on the internet is private... however, i'm just about on the same part of the fence as you jnk. You have ultimate ability to access the entries via the SQL server if you suspect anyone, so maybe we should just leave it private.
-=-=- YouTube Twitter Computer Science Series: Logic (pt1) (part 2) (part 3) 2's Complement Mathematics: Basic Differential Calculus
|
| Mon, 18 Sep 2006, 14:57 | |
HoboBen
|
I think mod-readable is fine - it's your site, and if you don't want certain things discussed, you should be able to stop the discussion of it. PMs should be used to communicate on something that would otherwise fill up the forums with posts that have no relevence to anyone else, not to have private uber H4X0R 1337 chat. -=-=- blog | work | code | more code |
| Mon, 18 Sep 2006, 14:58 | |
HoboBen
|
Editing of posts seems busted... 
|
| Mon, 18 Sep 2006, 15:09 | |
magicman
|
id prefer if it was all private myself.
|
| Mon, 18 Sep 2006, 15:10 | |
Jayenkai
|
Edit working again.
|
| Mon, 18 Sep 2006, 15:24 | |
|
Jayenkai
|
Right, the PM's are pretty much as private as you should expect. If I feel that I should check up on things, I can do it via raw database access, otherwise it isn't something I can easily peek into. -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
|
| Wed, 20 Sep 2006, 14:52 | |
tnt23
|
I think the best thing is that you can look if you want to, but you'll swear not to unless you suspect something.
-=-=- What if this were not a hypothetical question? |
| Wed, 20 Sep 2006, 15:28 | |
|
Scherererer
|
no italic bbcode? |edit| wait, how come mine does it but not his? |edit| -=-=- YouTube Twitter Computer Science Series: Logic (pt1) (part 2) (part 3) 2's Complement Mathematics: Basic Differential Calculus
|
| Wed, 20 Sep 2006, 15:32 | |
|
tnt23
|
I got it, just misunderstood the bbcode... nothing to see here, move along... jnk, u still didn't add delete.. 
-=-=- What if this were not a hypothetical question? |
| Sun, 24 Sep 2006, 11:40 | |
magicman
|
while though i like the little lol guy, i still like being able to say l o l with out the spaces.
-=-=- Stuff... Yeah...
|
| Sun, 24 Sep 2006, 19:22 | |
|
tnt23 |
off topic..
|
| Sun, 24 Sep 2006, 20:07 | |
|
magicman
|
just a little.
|
| Mon, 25 Sep 2006, 04:01 | |
|
Jayenkai
|
On the topic of the off-topic topic, the "Posts you've read" should just about work fine, now. Issues may occur when moving and deleting posts, but otherwise it should be fine. -=-=- ''Load, Next List!''
|
| Mon, 25 Sep 2006, 17:31 | |
|
tnt23
|
<<on the topic of the off-topic topic>> on the topic of the topic of the off-topic, semi-on-topic topic about a topic (say that 5 times), what does that have to do with pm's? -=-=- What if this were not a hypothetical question? |
| Mon, 25 Sep 2006, 18:12 | |
|
magicman
|
everything, and nothing at the exact same time.....
-=-=- Stuff... Yeah...
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||