|
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Shoutbox Topic - 255 |
|
| Wed, 06 Feb 2013, 21:18 | |
Cower
|
Sorry, Jay, I replied to a locked topic. But I had to. I really, really had to.
|
| Wed, 06 Feb 2013, 21:18 | |
Afr0
|
Cower, you're a fucktard. I was trying to have a civilized discussion about an article written by a woman with bizarre sexual preferences, which contained no images. If it had, I most likely wouldn't have been able to debate it on FB, as I would have been too busy trying to force my eyeballs out with a spoon
-=-=- Afr0 Games Project Dollhouse on Github - Please fork!
|
| Wed, 06 Feb 2013, 21:28 | |
|
Afr0
|
As to the conclusion of said debate, having sex with canines is difficult to classify as morally wrong because, as it turns out, canines have sex for pleasure just like humans. And it would be terribly difficult (for a woman, no less!) to have sex with a canine if it didn't really want to. Think barking, scratching, biting. From a scientific standpoint you can argue that it is counterproductive in terms of reproducing, but the same argument can be used about gay sex. And, as it turned out from the debate, it has been! So yeah... disgusting, but not neccessarily morally wrong. -=-=- Afr0 Games Project Dollhouse on Github - Please fork!
|
| Thu, 07 Feb 2013, 00:39 | |
Jayenkai
|
Do I ban A, or do I ban B? Ooh, the choices!!!
|
| Thu, 07 Feb 2013, 00:47 | |
Cower
|
The third choice is all of the above, of course.
|
| Thu, 07 Feb 2013, 03:48 | |
steve_ancell
|
Sorry but I also have to say that it's morally wrong for a human to get jiggy with the dog, they don't even resemble humans let alone being a different species altogether. Don't get me wrong though Mats; I'm not having a fallout with you, it's just that the sheer thought of screwing a dog or any other non-human species is just mank. |edit| Blimey!... I actually managed to comment without swearing for a change, damn I'm good!.  |edit|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||