123
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- (c) WidthPadding Industries 1987 0|404|0 -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
Socoder -> Off Topic -> Pixelart is Oldskool!
Mon, 09 Apr 2012, 23:18
spinal
 		’modern’ drawing software is crap. how the hell are you supposed to draw a solid pixel in these damn things?!?!?!

-=-=-
Check out my excellent homepage!
Mon, 09 Apr 2012, 23:18
Afr0
 		Photoshop has a pen tool for that purpose...
Mon, 09 Apr 2012, 23:51
9572AD
 		It's not drawing the solid pixel that's the problem - it's keeping it a solid pixel. Photo-manipulation software, even if you manage to turn off the inherent layer-blending in the cases where it's possible, won't think twice about smearing pixels together when saving the image in your desired format.

-=-=-
All the raw, animal magnetism of a rutabaga.